I fail to see how "Trump hires prostitutes to piss on a bed the Obamas slept in as an act of revenge" is seemingly well out of character for him. Got some inside info, do ya?
I'm not talking about evidence, I'm talking about railgunner's assertion that it's "obvious".
I get that, but the main point is that there's no reason to report it in the first place, because there is no evidence... regardless of how much you think it might be in line with his character to do it.
Besides, it worked so well on Clinton, can you blame anyone for adopting the tactic?
I don't know of any broadly reported unsourced attacks on Hillary Clinton. Can you give an example? The main attacks I know of on her were based on hacked documents that the DNC and others admitted were genuine; on a report by the FBI that no one called into question on the facts (though admittedly we cou
But in saying it this way, you're attempting to imply you can provide evidence. And I am simply pointing out that there is no reason to even consider that this is a possibility. Don't tell me you will do it later, because that's irrelevant. It's no different than saying nothing at all, or even saying "I have no evidence" or "I cannot provide evidence." They are all exactly equivalent in the end, except that the other methods do not have the implication that you might actually provide the evidence, despi
Your fake concern is fake noted. That said, the pudge of old would have been able to convey that with one simple sentence and a shrug. This [youtube.com] may be relevant to your interests.
Now, in the interest of avoiding your pedantic tendencies as much as possible, I feel we'll have to define "broadly reported unsourced attacks" before I get started.
For example, I doubt you'd approve of me using a site like Newsmax.com, despite its age and traffic. Which is fine, as they don't actually produce much content anyw
"May the forces of evil become confused on the way to your house."
-- George Carlin
Whoah there (Score:2)
I fail to see how "Trump hires prostitutes to piss on a bed the Obamas slept in as an act of revenge" is seemingly well out of character for him. Got some inside info, do ya?
Re: (Score:2)
Even if you think it is in his character, unless there's SOME evidence it happened, then it's irresponsible to treat it as though it's possibly true.
Re: (Score:2)
Besides, it worked so well on Clinton, can you blame anyone for adopting the tactic?
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not talking about evidence, I'm talking about railgunner's assertion that it's "obvious".
I get that, but the main point is that there's no reason to report it in the first place, because there is no evidence ... regardless of how much you think it might be in line with his character to do it.
Besides, it worked so well on Clinton, can you blame anyone for adopting the tactic?
I don't know of any broadly reported unsourced attacks on Hillary Clinton. Can you give an example? The main attacks I know of on her were based on hacked documents that the DNC and others admitted were genuine; on a report by the FBI that no one called into question on the facts (though admittedly we cou
Re: (Score:2)
Incorrect. Page views and the like are cash money.
I don't know of any broadly reported unsourced attacks on Hillary Clinton.
Of course not, you don't read the NYT.
Re: (Score:2)
Incorrect. Page views and the like are cash money.
I meant -- obviously -- there is no journalistic or democratic reason to do it. Everything has a reason.
I don't know of any broadly reported unsourced attacks on Hillary Clinton.
Of course not, you don't read the NYT.
So you have no examples, then. Good to know.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Until you provide evidence, I won't believe it exists.
(See how this works?)
Re:Whoah there (Score:2)
That's why I said catch you later. I'm not back in the office until Tuesday.
Re: (Score:2)
But in saying it this way, you're attempting to imply you can provide evidence. And I am simply pointing out that there is no reason to even consider that this is a possibility. Don't tell me you will do it later, because that's irrelevant. It's no different than saying nothing at all, or even saying "I have no evidence" or "I cannot provide evidence." They are all exactly equivalent in the end, except that the other methods do not have the implication that you might actually provide the evidence, despi
Re: (Score:2)
Now, in the interest of avoiding your pedantic tendencies as much as possible, I feel we'll have to define "broadly reported unsourced attacks" before I get started.
For example, I doubt you'd approve of me using a site like Newsmax.com, despite its age and traffic. Which is fine, as they don't actually produce much content anyw