despite developers' positive feelings toward Rust, 97% of them hadn't actually used it.
Who says they love something they have not used???
I might say something seems decent, but no way would I say I *LOVE* a language until I've done a few real things in it.
The top issues that respondents say the Rust project could do to improve adoption of the language are better training and documentation, followed by better libraries, IDE integration, and improved compile times...
You left out the part about not wanting to be in a project that spends more of its time debating what a man should call his vagina than working on actual work.
There's nothing wrong with wanting to have good morals and values, but it makes no sense to me that you'd create a new language to replace time-tested, fully functioning languages on the basis that those languages get in the way of a developer's thought process, only to later tie-in a bunch of non-development related issues that get in the way of a developer's thought process.
Wait a second... (Score:5, Insightful)
despite developers' positive feelings toward Rust, 97% of them hadn't actually used it.
Who says they love something they have not used???
I might say something seems decent, but no way would I say I *LOVE* a language until I've done a few real things in it.
The top issues that respondents say the Rust project could do to improve adoption of the language are better training and documentation, followed by better libraries, IDE integration, and improved compile times...
That is a pretty tall list of things that
Re: (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Wait a second... (Score:3)