I do architectural design and SU is not the answer to every problem. If you're doing multi-million dollar designs, heck, spend a couple bucks and use programs that are easier and more powerful. Sure, it can be fun to try to learn and navigate your way through the program, but give me my architectural design software with ease and simplicity and powerful photo-realistic images in a fraction of the time of SU. Play with free. Work with paid for programs.
by Anonymous Coward writes:
on Wednesday June 23, 2010 @01:39PM (#32667558)
Exactly. It's like the idiots who maintain that Duh GIMP is a professional tool. It's so hard to not just laugh in their faces when freetards make this argument. And before someone comes along to say "BUT BUT IT'S FOR AMATEURS!!!" one can just point out programs like Paint.NET that are far easier to use and more powerful than Duh GIMP even for amateurs.
One program that is very hard to learn, and basically useless is Adobe Photoshop. Spent some time to figure it out and it really is unintuitive. Makes Gimp looks like a gem. What do professionals use to make their time worthwhile?
You see but you do not observe.
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, in "The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes"
Free is not always better (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Free is not always better (Score:-1, Troll)
Exactly. It's like the idiots who maintain that Duh GIMP is a professional tool. It's so hard to not just laugh in their faces when freetards make this argument. And before someone comes along to say "BUT BUT IT'S FOR AMATEURS!!!" one can just point out programs like Paint.NET that are far easier to use and more powerful than Duh GIMP even for amateurs.
Re: (Score:0)
One program that is very hard to learn, and basically useless is Adobe Photoshop. Spent some time to figure it out and it really is unintuitive. Makes Gimp looks like a gem. What do professionals use to make their time worthwhile?